During the BGT 2024-25 series at the SCG, former cricketers expressed strong disapproval over Washington Sundar’s controversial dismissal, labeling the decision as a “crap decision.” Sundar was controversially given out after being judged caught behind, despite replays suggesting there was no clear evidence of an edge. The incident sparked widespread criticism from pundits and former players, who questioned the accuracy of the decision-making process and the technology used. The dismissal quickly became a hot topic in cricket circles, with many calling for better clarity in such decisions.
Washington Sundar was dismissed by Pat Cummins for 14 runs in the SCG Test.
This highly competitive series has been marred by several controversial third umpire decisions. While Yashasvi Jaiswal was at the center of one such incident at the MCG, it is now Washington Sundar who feels aggrieved by the third umpire’s decision in the Sydney Test.
The Sydney Test, the final match of the series, which stands at 2-1, began on Friday with India’s stand-in captain, Jasprit Bumrah, opting to bat first after winning the toss on a green pitch. Several Indian batsmen got starts and spent time in the middle, but none could convert their innings into a half-century.
Sundar became the eighth wicket to fall at 148 in a highly controversial manner, reminiscent of Jaiswal’s dismissal in the second innings at the MCG.
Pat Cummins attempted to bounce out Sundar, who went for a pull shot but missed. Alex Carey made a confident appeal, which was initially turned down by the on-field umpire. However, Carey persuaded Cummins to opt for a DRS review.
The third umpire, Joel Wilson, used Snicko technology to check for any edge or glove involvement. Throughout the review process, there were murmurs regarding the clarity of the Snicko, creating uncertainty for the umpire.
A spike was detected on the frame after the ball passed just below Sundar’s glove. Wilson concluded that the spike indicated the ball had brushed the glove, although this remained inconclusive for viewers and experts. Wilson stated, “Got a spike on the edge there, ball is very close to the glove. I can’t differentiate any gap between ball and glove… Yeah, I have a spike. No gap between bat and ball.”
As a result, the on-field not out decision was overturned, and a visibly upset Sundar was forced to leave the field.
Twitter Reactions to Washington Sundar’s Controversial Dismissal in SCG Test
The third umpire’s decision sparked outrage on social media.
Former England captain Michael Vaughan expressed his frustration on Twitter, stating, “No way is that OUT… that’s an awful decision…”
No way is that OUT … that’s an awful decision …
— Michael Vaughan (@MichaelVaughan) January 3, 2025
Former India batsman Robin Uthappa expressed his disagreement, saying, “I’m sorry, but that’s a terrible decision! Yes, there was a spike, but from the side angle, it’s clear there was a gap between the ball and the glove. Decisions like these are full of ambiguity. The benefit should always go to the batter.”
I’m sorry but that’s a crap decision!! Sure the was a spike but from the side angle there was a clear space between ball and glove. There is a lot of ambiguity with these kind of decisions. Benefit must go to the batter #BGT2024
— Robbie Uthappa (@robbieuthappa) January 3, 2025
Here are a few tweets from fans regarding this matter:
My current dullest opinion: think Snicko is less good than UltraEdge. Operated by two different companies.
— Cameron Ponsonby (@cameronponsonby) January 3, 2025
Didn't pick up Jaiswal glove at MCG; seemed a frame out for Akash Deep and that decision for Sundar was blurry murmur the whole way through.
No way that's out. Same Aussies again and Washington Sundar gets robbed this time. pic.twitter.com/kO7TEuKp0K
— Div🦁 (@div_yumm) January 3, 2025
The ball didn’t even come close to Washington Sundar, No contact with the bat or gloves but the Snickometer showed spikes🙏
— 𝘿 (@DilipVK18) January 3, 2025
Once a cheater, always a cheater @cricketcomau @FoxCricket pic.twitter.com/Ke5Z7jKkFL
One day you want to trust your eyes, another day you completely ignore. Jaiswal was out. No doubt. But there wasn't anything on Snicko. Sundar, on the other hand, didn't visibly hit the ball. https://t.co/RPTtygh7WI
— Silly Point (@FarziCricketer) January 3, 2025
Don't think there was enough conclusive evidence to overturn the on field call for Sundar's dismissal. Thought the 3rd umpire got it spot on with Jaiswal in MCG, but not here.
— Gurkirat Singh Gill (@gurkiratsgill) January 3, 2025